Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBala, G
dc.contributor.authorSirisha, K
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T19:09:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T05:25:45Z
dc.date.available2017-11-21T19:09:45Z
dc.date.available2018-07-31T05:25:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-22
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/2775
dc.identifier.abstracthttp://etd.iisc.ac.in/static/etd/abstracts/3647/G26296-Abs.pdfen_US
dc.description.abstractThe climatic effects of Solar Radiation Management (SRM) geoengineering have been often modeled by simply reducing the solar constant. This is most likely valid only for space sunshades and not for atmosphere and surface based SRM methods. In this thesis, a global climate model is used to test if the climate response to SRM by stratospheric aerosols and uniform solar constant reduction are similar. Our analysis shows that when global mean warming from a doubling of CO2 is nearly cancelled by both these methods, they are similar when important surface and tropospheric climate variables are considered. However, a difference of 1K in the global mean stratospheric (61-9.8 hPa) temperature is simulated between the two SRM methods. Further, while the global mean surface diffuse radiation increases by about 15- 20% and direct radiation decreases by about 8% in the case of sulphate aerosol SRM method, both direct and diffuse radiation decrease by similar fractional amounts (~ -1.5%) when solar constant is reduced. When CO2 fertilization effects from elevated CO2 concentration levels are removed, the contribution from shaded leaves to gross primary productivity (GPP) increases by 6 % in aerosol SRM because of increased diffuse light. However, this increase is almost offset by a 7% decline in sunlit contribution due to reduced direct light. Overall both the SRM simulations show similar decrease in GPP (~ 1%) and NPP (~ 0.7%). Based on our results we conclude that the climate states produced by a reduction in solar constant and addition of aerosols into the stratosphere can be considered almost similar except for two important aspects: stratospheric temperature change and the consequent implications for the dynamics and the chemistry of the stratosphere and the partitioning of direct versus diffuse radiation reaching the surface. Further, the likely dependence of global hydrological cycle response on aerosol particle size and the latitudinal and height distribution of aerosols is discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesG26296en_US
dc.subjectSolar Radiation Managementen_US
dc.subjectStratospheric Aerosolsen_US
dc.subjectSolar Constanten_US
dc.subjectStratospheric Warmingen_US
dc.subjectSunshadesen_US
dc.subjectStratospheric Sulphate Aerosolsen_US
dc.subjectSolar Radiation Management (SRM)en_US
dc.subjectDiffuse Radiationen_US
dc.subjectSolar Constant Reductionen_US
dc.subjectAerosolen_US
dc.subject.classificationMeteorologyen_US
dc.titleModeling of Solar Radiation Management : A Comparison of Simulations using Reduced Solar Constant and Stratospheric Aerosolsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSc Enggen_US
dc.degree.levelMastersen_US
dc.degree.disciplineFaculty of Engineeringen_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record