dc.contributor.advisor | Bala Subrahmanya, M H | |
dc.contributor.author | Loganathan, Muralidharan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-22T10:16:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-22T10:16:40Z | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/5212 | |
dc.description.abstract | Entrepreneurship is key to drive innovation, create wealth and jobs in any economy. Entrepreneurial
startups hold the promise of high growth, yet they encounter high failure rates due to uncertainties,
particularly in early stages. Hence, supporting entrepreneurship is critical in transitioning economies like
India. Even while India is home to several burgeoning entrepreneurial ecosystems, support for
entrepreneurship is underdeveloped. This makes case for government support to develop institutions
for entrepreneurship support. Technology business incubators emerged as a key vehicle for
entrepreneurship support in India. However, there is a dearth of quantitative empirical studies
examining effectiveness of incubation support in India. In this study we examine the effectiveness of
incubators supported by Department of Science and Technology, Government of India’s institutional
mechanisms across six states. We conceptualize incubation support at macro-, meso- and micro- levels
corresponding to the main stakeholders viz. the government, the host university and the
entrepreneurial startups, respectively.
At the macro-level, we look at the government’s objective to develop access and availability of
incubation support to startups. Government support has led to qualitative development of market
infrastructure and financial access to startups. We report key differences in scale, efficiency and survival
among incubated startups based on an incubator typology. We find that university-based incubators
have not achieved scale as compared to private-sector incubators. We find that specialized incubators
are more efficient and share long term risks with technology startups through their investments.
At the meso-level, we look at the universities’ objective to become entrepreneurial by supporting
technology startups. We evaluate the efficiency of universities in performing entrepreneurship support
through incubators alongside their traditional research and teaching outcomes. We use a slack-based
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to compare efficiency of universities across the six states. From our
analysis we find that fully efficient universities were only a few and were performing well across all the
three outcomes. Moderately efficient universities were mostly teaching oriented and the weakly
efficient universities mostly did not show particular orientation towards any of the outcomes. We show
the existence of distinct strategies for universities to evolve into active entrepreneurial universities
through incubation.
At the micro-level, we look at the startups’ objective to develop new products and services utilizing
incubation support. At the initiation stage startups exhibit distinct motivations on infrastructure and
networking to seek incubation. At the engagement stage, startups utilize incubation services and
network with the host universities. We find that such an engagement is contingent on the alignment of
startup knowledge areas with the university and the orientation of the university. We argue that this
supports knowledge-spill over from the university to the startups through the incubator. At the
performance stage, we find that incubation contributes to technology development capability of
startups. Based on the analyses, we derive managerial and policy implications for incubator managers,
universities, startups and the government. We recommend potential strategies including specialization
and public-private partnerships. These strategies can help improve the entrepreneurial ecosystem and
drive the growth of genuine, innovative technology startups in India | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.rights | I grant Indian Institute of Science the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now hereafter known. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part
of this thesis or dissertation | en_US |
dc.subject | Entrepreneurship | en_US |
dc.subject | Technology business incubators | en_US |
dc.subject | empirical studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Data Envelopment Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | startup incubation | en_US |
dc.subject | Government support - Business incubation | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Business and economics | en_US |
dc.title | The Effectiveness of Technology Business Incubation: An Empirical Analysis in the Indian Context | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.degree.name | PhD | en_US |
dc.degree.level | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.degree.grantor | Indian Institute of Science | en_US |
dc.degree.discipline | Engineering | en_US |