dc.contributor.advisor | Singla, Pooja | |
dc.contributor.author | Hassain, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-21T09:47:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-21T09:47:14Z | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/5136 | |
dc.description.abstract | Let o be the ring of integers of a non-Archimedean local field such that the residue field has
characteristic p: Let p be the maximal ideal of o: For Char¹oº = 0; let e be the ramification
index of o: i.e., 2o = pe: Let GLn¹oº be the group of n n invertible matrices with entries
from o and SLn¹oº be the subgroup of GLn¹oº consisting of all determinant one matrices.
In this dissertation, our focus is on the construction of the continuous complex irreducible
representations of the group SL2¹oº and to describe the representation growth. Also we will
discus some results about group algebras of SL2 ¹o pr º for large r and branching laws obtained
by restricting irreducible representations of GL2¹o pr º to SL2¹o pr º:
Construction: For r 1; the construction of irreducible representations of GL2¹o pr º and
for SL2¹o pr º with p > 2 are known by the work of Jaikin-Zapirain and Stasinski-Stevens.
However, those methods do not work for p = 2: In this case we give a construction of all
irreducible representations of groups SL2¹o pr º; for r 1with Char¹oº = 2 and for r 4e + 2
with Char¹oº = 0:
RepresentationGrowth: For a rigid groupG; it iswell knownthat the abscissa of convergence
¹Gº of the representation zeta function ofG gives precise information about its representation
growth. Jaikin-Zapirain and Avni-Klopsch-Onn-Voll proved that ¹SL2¹oºº = 1; for either
p > 2 or Char¹oº = 0: We complete these results by proving that ¹SL2¹oºº = 1 also for p = 2
and Char¹oº > 0:
Group Algebras: The groups GL2¹o pr º and GL2¹ q»t¼ ¹tr ºº need not be isomorphic, but
the group algebras »GL2¹o pr º¼ and »GL2¹ q»t¼ ¹tr ºº¼ are known to be isomorphic. In
parallel for p > 2 and r 1; the group algebras »SL2¹o pr º¼ and »SL2¹ q»t¼ ¹tr ºº¼ are also
isomorphic. We show that for p = 2 and Char¹oº = 0; the group algebras »SL2¹o pr º¼ and
»SL2¹ q»t¼ ¹tr ºº¼ are not isomorphic for r 2e + 2: As a corollary we obtain that the group
algebras, »SL2¹ 2r º¼ and »SL2¹ 2»t¼ ¹tr ºº¼ are not isomorphic for r 4:
Branching Laws: We give a description of the branching laws obtained by restricting
irreducible representations of GL2¹o pr º to SL2¹o pr º for p = 2: In this case, we again show
that many results for p = 2 are quite different from the case p > 2: | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ;G29885 | |
dc.rights | I grant Indian Institute of Science the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now hereafter known. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part
of this thesis or dissertation | en_US |
dc.subject | Branching Laws | en_US |
dc.subject | Groups | en_US |
dc.subject | Jaikin-Zapirain | en_US |
dc.subject | Avni-Klopsch-Onn-Voll | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Research Subject Categories::MATHEMATICS::Algebra, geometry and mathematical analysis | en_US |
dc.title | Representations of Special Compact Linear Groups of Order Two : Construction, Representation Growth, Group Algebras and Branching Laws | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.degree.name | PhD | en_US |
dc.degree.level | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.degree.grantor | Indian Institute of Science | en_US |
dc.degree.discipline | Faculty of Science | en_US |