Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGhosh, M K ; Ramaswamy, M
dc.contributor.authorChaudhuri, Nirmalendu
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-30T09:46:46Z
dc.date.available2025-12-30T09:46:46Z
dc.date.submitted2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/7979
dc.description.abstractInequalities involving integrals of a function and its derivatives appear frequently in various branches of mathematics and represent a useful tool, e.g., in the theory and practice of differential equations, in the theory of approximation, etc. A general question in this direction can be stated as: Let ? be an open subset of ?? and w, w?, …, w? be given weight functions (measurable and positive almost everywhere). Now the question is: do there exist positive real numbers p and q such that the following inequality (???u(x)?pw(x)?dx)1/p?C?i=1n(????iu(x)?qwi(x)?dx)1/q(0.1)\left( \int_\Omega |u(x)|^p w(x) \, dx \right)^{1/p} \leq C \sum_{i=1}^n \left( \int_\Omega |\partial_i u(x)|^q w_i(x) \, dx \right)^{1/q} \tag{0.1}(????u(x)?pw(x)dx)1/p?Ci=1?n?(?????i?u(x)?qwi?(x)dx)1/q(0.1) holds for all u?Cc?(?)u \in C_c^\infty(\Omega)u?Cc??(?)? If w, w?, …, w? are bounded weights, the study of inequality (0.1) is quite well understood. Here, we are mainly interested in the case when w is a singular weight and w? = 1 for all i = 1, …, n. In 1920, G. H. Hardy proved the following inequality: Let 1<p<?1 < p < \infty1<p<?, then ?0??u(x)x?pdx?(pp?1)p?0??u?(x)?pdx,(0.2)\int_0^\infty \left| \frac{u(x)}{x} \right|^p dx \leq \left( \frac{p}{p-1} \right)^p \int_0^\infty |u'(x)|^p dx, \tag{0.2}?0???xu(x)??pdx?(p?1p?)p?0???u?(x)?pdx,(0.2) for all u?Cc?(0,?)u \in C_c^\infty(0,\infty)u?Cc??(0,?). Moreover, (pp?1)p\left( \frac{p}{p-1} \right)^p(p?1p?)p is the best constant and the inequality is strict unless u=0u = 0u=0. Analogues of inequality (0.2) exist in higher dimensions. More precisely, for any p,1<p<np, 1 < p < np,1<p<n, the following Hardy–Sobolev inequality holds: ?Rn?u(x)?p?x?pdx?(pn?p)p?Rn??u(x)?pdx,(0.3)\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \frac{|u(x)|^p}{|x|^p} dx \leq \left( \frac{p}{n-p} \right)^p \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} |\nabla u(x)|^p dx, \tag{0.3}?Rn??x?p?u(x)?p?dx?(n?pp?)p?Rn???u(x)?pdx,(0.3) for all u?D1,p(Rn)u \in D^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)u?D1,p(Rn), where D1,p(Rn)D^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)D1,p(Rn) is the completion of Cc?(Rn)C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)Cc??(Rn) in the norm ?u?1,p=??u?p\|u\|_{1,p} = \|\nabla u\|_p?u?1,p?=??u?p?. The constant An,p:=(pn?p)pA_{n,p} := \left( \frac{p}{n-p} \right)^pAn,p?:=(n?pp?)p is the best in inequality (0.3). Moreover, for any bounded domain ? containing 0, inequality (0.3) holds for any uuu in the Sobolev space W01,p(?)W_0^{1,p}(\Omega)W01,p?(?), which is the completion of Cc?(?)C_c^\infty(\Omega)Cc??(?) in the norm ?u?1,p,?:=(???u(x)?pdx+????u?pdx)1/p,\|u\|_{1,p,\Omega} := \left( \int_\Omega |u(x)|^p dx + \int_\Omega |\nabla u|^p dx \right)^{1/p},?u?1,p,??:=(????u(x)?pdx+?????u?pdx)1/p, and An,pA_{n,p}An,p? is independent of the domain. The most interesting fact about inequality (0.3) is that the constant An,pA_{n,p}An,p? is never achieved (in the sense that equality holds for some u?0?W01,p(?)u \neq 0 \in W_0^{1,p}(\Omega)u?=0?W01,p?(?)) in any domain, not even in the whole space, and this will be the source of many problems which we deal with in this thesis. Some questions arise: Is it possible to add a second term (at least when ? is a bounded domain) on the right-hand side of inequality (0.3)? If yes, what would be the ‘best’ term? Does this process stop? In Chapter 2, we answer these questions and present the following theorem: Theorem. Let R>sup???x?R > \sup_\Omega |x|R>sup???x? and 1<p<n1 < p < n1<p<n. Then there exists C>0C > 0C>0, depending on n, p, and R, such that ???u(x)?p?x?p(log?(R/?x?))?dx?C????u?pdx,\int_\Omega \frac{|u(x)|^p}{|x|^p (\log(R/|x|))^\gamma} dx \leq C \int_\Omega |\nabla u|^p dx,????x?p(log(R/?x?))??u(x)?p?dx?C?????u?pdx, for any u?W01,p(?)u \in W_0^{1,p}(\Omega)u?W01,p?(?) if and only if (i) ?>2\gamma > 2?>2 when 1<p<n1 < p < n1<p<n, (ii) ?>n\gamma > n?>n when p=np = np=n. More generally, for 2<p<n2 < p < n2<p<n and for any 1<q<p?:=npn?p1 < q < p^* := \frac{np}{n-p}1<q<p?:=n?pnp?, there exists C1>0C_1 > 0C1?>0 depending on n, p, q, R, and ? such that ???u(x)?q?x?qdx+?\int_\Omega \frac{|u(x)|^q}{|x|^q} dx + \cdots????x?q?u(x)?q?dx+? (Corollary and further results follow similarly.) Later chapters deal with: The differential operator related to inequality (0.3) in the case p=2p = 2p=2, i.e., study of the operator L?:=?????x?2L_\mu := -\Delta - \frac{\mu}{|x|^2}L??:=????x?2??. Pohozaev-type identities showing non-existence of positive solutions for certain eigenvalue problems. Existence and non-existence results for nonlinear weighted problems. Perturbation of operators and improved Hardy–Sobolev inequalities applied to parabolic problems.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesT04970
dc.rightsI grant Indian Institute of Science the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now hereafter known. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation
dc.subjectHardy–Sobolev Inequality
dc.subjectSingular Weight Function
dc.subjectNonlinear Weighted Problem
dc.titleOn hardy-sobolev inequality and its application to certain singular problems
dc.degree.namePhD
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.grantorIndian Institute of Science
dc.degree.disciplineScience


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record