Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGanguli, Ranjan
dc.contributor.advisorMani, V
dc.contributor.authorDutta, Rajdeep
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-03T04:30:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T05:15:31Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T04:30:32Z
dc.date.available2018-07-31T05:15:31Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-03
dc.date.submitted2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/2281
dc.identifier.abstracthttp://etd.iisc.ac.in/static/etd/abstracts/2936/G25124-Abs.pdfen_US
dc.description.abstractProblems in the control and identification of structural dynamic systems can lead to multimodal optimization problems, which are difficult to solve using classical gradient based methods. In this work, optimization problems pertaining to the vibration control of smart structures and the exploration of isospectral systems are addressed. Isospectral vibrating systems have identical natural frequencies, and existence of the isospectral systems proves non-uniqueness in system identification. For the smart structure problem, the optimal location(s) of collocated actuator(s)/sensor(s) and the optimal feedback gain matrix are obtained by maximizing the energy dissipated by the feedback control system. For the isospectral system problem, both discrete and continuous systems are considered. An error function is designed to calculate the error between the spectra of two distinct structural dynamic systems. For the discrete system, the Jacobi matrix, derived from the given system, is modified and the problem is posed as an optimization problem where the objective is to minimize the non-negative error function. Isospectral spring-mass systems are obtained. For the continuous system, finite element modeling is used and an error function is designed to calculate the error between the spectra of the uniform beam and the non-uniform beam. Non-uniform cantilever beams which are isospectral to a given uniform cantilever beam are obtained by minimizing the non-negative error function. Numerical studies reveal several isospectral systems, and optimal gain matrices and sensor/actuator locations for the smart structure. New evolutionary algorithms, which do not need genetic operators such as crossover and mutation, are used for the optimization. These algorithms are: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm, Glowworm swarm optimization (GSO) algorithm, Firefly algorithm (FA) and Electromagnetism inspired optimization (EIO) algorithm.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesG25124en_US
dc.subjectVibration Problems - Optimization Theoryen_US
dc.subjectStructural Analysis (Aerospace Engineering)en_US
dc.subjectDamage Mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectActuators - Locationen_US
dc.subjectSensors - Locationen_US
dc.subjectIsospectral Vibrating Systemsen_US
dc.subjectStructural Dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectSmart Structures - Vibration Controlen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary Optimizationen_US
dc.subjectStructural Optimizationen_US
dc.subjectIsospectral Discrete Systemen_US
dc.subjectIsospectral Spring-mass Systemsen_US
dc.subject.classificationAeronauticsen_US
dc.titleEvolutionary Optimization For Vibration Analysis And Controlen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSc Enggen_US
dc.degree.levelMastersen_US
dc.degree.disciplineFaculty of Engineeringen_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record