Large Eddy Simulation of Multiphase Flows
Deevi, Sri Vallabha
MetadataShow full item record
Multiphase ﬂows are a common phenomenon. Rains, sediment transport in rivers, snow and dust storms, mud slides and avalanches are examples of multiphase ﬂows occurring in nature. Blood ﬂow is an example of multiphase ﬂow in the human body, which is of vital importance for survival. Multiphase ﬂows occur widely in industrial applications from hydrocarbon extrac-tion to fuel combustion in engines, from spray painting to spray drying, evaporators, pumps and pneumatic conveying. Predicting multiphase ﬂows is of vital importance to understand natural phenomenon and to design and improve industrial processes. Separated ﬂows and dispersed ﬂows are two types of multiphase ﬂows, which occur together in many industrial applications. Physical features of these two classes are different and the transition from one to another involves complex ﬂow physics. Experimental studies of multiphase ﬂows are not easy, as most real world phenomenon cannot be scaled down to laboratory models. Even for those phenomenon that can be demonstrated at lab-oratory scale, rescaling to real world applications requires mathematical models. There are many challenges in experimental measurements of multiphase ﬂows as well. Measurement techniques well suited for single phase ﬂows have constraints when measuring multiphase phenomenon. Un-certainty in experimental measurements poses considerable difﬁculties in validating numerical models developed for predicting these ﬂows. Owing to the computational effort required, direct simulation of multiphase ﬂows, even for small scale real world applications is out of present scope. Numerical methods have been developed for dealing with each class of ﬂow separately, that in-volves use of models for phenomenon that is computationally demanding. Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods for predicting multiphase ﬂows place strong requirements on turbulence models, as information about ﬂuctuating quantities in the ﬁeld, that have signiﬁcant effects on dispersed phase, is not available. Large Eddy Simulation (LES) gives better predictions than RANS as the instantaneous ﬁeld data is available and large scale unsteadiness that effects the dispersed phase can be captured. Recent LES studies of multiphase ﬂows showed that the sub-grid-scale (SGS) model used for the continuous phase has an effect on the evolution of the dispersed phase. In this work, LES of multiphase ﬂows is performed using Explicit Filtering Large Eddy Sim-ulation method. In this method, spatial derivatives are computed using higher order compact schemes that have spectral-like resolution. SGS modeling is provided by the use of a ﬁlter with smoothly falling transfer function. This method is mathematically consistent and converges to a DNS as the grid is reﬁned. It has been successfully applied to combustion and aero-acoustics and this work is the ﬁrst application of the method to multiphase ﬂows. Study of dispersed multiphase ﬂows was carried out in this work. Modeling of the dispersed phase is kept simple since the in-tention was to evaluate the capability of explicit ﬁltering LES method in predicting multiphase ﬂows. Continuous phase is solved using a compressible formulation with explicit ﬁltering method. Spatial derivatives are computed using fourth and sixth order compact schemes that use derivative splitting method proposed by Hixon & Turkel (2000a) and second order Runge-Kutta (RK2) time stepping. The grid is stretched as needed. Non-reﬂecting boundary conditions due to Poinsot & Lele (1992) are used to avoid acoustic reﬂections from boundaries. Buffer zones (Bogey & Bailly (2002)) are employed at outﬂow and lateral boundaries to damp vortical structures. The code developed for continuous phase is evaluated by studying round jets at Re =36,000 and comparing with experimental measurements of Hussein et al. (1994) and Panchapakesan & Lumley (1993). Simulations showed excellent agreement with experimental results. Rate of decay of axial velocity and the evolution of turbulence intensities on the centerline matched very well with measurements. Radial proﬁles of mean and ﬂuctuating components of velocities exhibit self-similarity. A set of studies were then performed using this code to assess the effect of numerical scheme, grid reﬁnement & stretching and simulation times on the predictions. Results from these simulations showed good agreements with experiments and established the code for use in multiphase ﬂows under various simulation conditions. To assess the prediction of multiphase ﬂows using this LES method, an evaporating spray ex-periment by Chen et al. (2006) was simulated. The experiment uses a nebuliser for generating a ﬁnely atomized spray of acetone, which avoids complex breakdown phenomenon associated with air blast atomizers and provides well deﬁned boundary conditions for model evaluation. The neb-uliser sits upstream in a pipe carrying air and droplets travel along with air for a distance of 10 diameters before exiting into a wind tunnel with co-ﬂowing air. Droplet breakdown, if any, takes place inside the pipe and the spray is ﬁnely atomized by the time it reaches pipe exit. One of the experimental cases at Re =31,600, with a mass loading of 1.1% and a jet velocity of 56 m/s is simulated. Particle size has a χsquared distribution with a Sauter mean diameter of 18µm. In the self-similar region, decay of centerline velocity and turbulence intensities matched well with ex-perimental results. Continuous phase exhibits self-similar behavior. A series of simulations were then performed to match the initial region of the spray by altering the inﬂow conditions in the sim-ulation. Simulation that matched the breakdown location of the experiment revealed the presence of a relaxation zone with a higher initial spreading rate, followed by a lower asymptotic spreading rate. Studies were performed to understand the effect of various phenomenon like evaporation and droplet size on this behavior. A study of breakdown region of particle-laden jets was performed to understand the presence of relaxation zone post breakdown. Flow conditions were similar to evaporating spray experiment except that particles do not evaporate, mass loading is 2% and jet Reynolds number Re =2000. A series of grid reﬁnements were performed and on the largest grid, gird spacing Δy =7.5η, where ηis an estimate of the Kolmogorov length scale based on ﬂow conditions. Decay of axial velocity on the centerline showed variations with grid reﬁnement, tending to the experimentally measured value as the grid is reﬁned. Variation of turbulence intensities along the centerline revealed a jump in axial velocity ﬂuctuations at the breakdown location, while radial and azimuthal velocities showed a smooth increase to their asymptotic value. This jump was resolved on grid reﬁnement and on ﬁne grids axial velocity ﬂuctuations followed the other two quantities closely in their rise to asymptotic state. Comparison of these quantities with a jet without particles revealed that the ﬂow features are same for a jet with and without particles, and at the mass loading studied, particles have negligible effect on jet breakdown. Another study performed at a higher Reynolds number of Re =11,000, under similar ﬂow conditions showed similar behavior. To assess the ability of predicting dispersed phase, simulations of particle-laden ﬂows at low Stokes number were performed and compared against an experiment by Lau & Nathan (2014). The experiment studies variation of velocity and particle concentration along the centerline, and half widths of a jet velocity and concentration. Particles are injected into a pipe along with air, and the two phase ﬂow is fully developed by the time it exits the pipe into a wind tunnel along with a co-ﬂow. Particles are mono-disperse with a density of 1200 kg/m3. Mass loading is 40% so that particles have a signiﬁcant effect on the continuous phase. Two cases at particle Stokes number of 1.4, one with Re =10,000, bulk velocity of 12 m/s and particle diameter of 20µm and another with Re =22,500, bulk velocity of 36 m/s and particle diameter of 10µm were simulated. Simulations of both the cases showed good match with experimental measurements of centerline decay for the continuous phase. For the dispersed case, simulations with larger particles showed good match with experimental results, while smaller particles showed differences. This was understood to be the effect of lateral migration which is prominent in case of smaller particles, the models for which have not been used in the present simulation study.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Effect of Particle Shape on the Mechanical Behaviour of Granular Media : Discrete Element Simulations Anitha Kumari, S D (2018-03-08)Granular materials are characterized by its discrete nature which makes their behaviour very complex to understand when subjected to various loading situations. Comparing other materials, the understanding of granular ...
Automatic Generation Of Compiled Cycle Level Microarchitecture Simulators For Superspeculative Processors Chandran, Priya (2011-07-25)
Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories of Proteins Performed using Different Forcefields and Identifiction of Mobile Segments Katagi, Gurunath M (2018-04-03)The selection of the forcefield is a crucial issue in any MD related work and there is no clear indication as to which of the many available forcefields is the best for protein analysis. Many recent literature surveys ...