Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVenkatraman, Kartik
dc.contributor.authorKarnick, Pradeepa Tumkur
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T06:28:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T05:15:51Z
dc.date.available2017-09-27T06:28:37Z
dc.date.available2018-07-31T05:15:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-27
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/2688
dc.identifier.abstracthttp://etd.iisc.ac.in/static/etd/abstracts/3509/G25863-Abs.pdfen_US
dc.description.abstractTransonic utter is an aeroelastic instability characterized by part-chord shocks over an airfoil and single mode oscillations leading to a drop in the utter boundary. We present a numerical study that examines the influence of shocks, shock-boundary layer interactions, and three-dimensional flow features on the transonic utter boundary. Using energy concepts we show that shocks and shock-boundary layer interactions have a profound influence on the stability of an aeroelastic system. Viscosity stabilizes the aeroelastic system through thickness effects up-to the bottom of the transonic dip. Beyond, shock induced separation not only stalls the aeroelastic system, but also makes it oscillate about a new equilibrium position. In this region, where viscous effects are dominant, the inviscid utter boundary shows multiple utter points. Modal contributions to the response of the aeroelastic systems |viscous and inviscid | indicate that viscosity restricts higher mode participation. Restriction of higher modes by viscosity is responsible for the elimination of multiple utter points that are present in the inviscid case. Multiple forcing frequencies are observed in those regions of the utter boundary where viscous effects are dominant. Further, the shock dynamics exhibit shock-reversal where-in the shock motion predicted by the viscous simulation is 180_ out of phase relative to that of the inviscid case. At Mach numbers beyond the shock-stall region the shock moves close to the trailing edge of the airfoil, and inviscid and viscous simulations predict almost a similar utter boundary. Three-dimensional transonic flow structures on a finite-span wing aeroelastic model de-stabilizes it relative to an equivalent two-dimensional model.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesG25863en_US
dc.subjectAerodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectAirfoilen_US
dc.subjectTransonic Flutteren_US
dc.subjectShock-Boundry Layeren_US
dc.subjectAirplanesen_US
dc.subjectTurbulent Viscous Flowen_US
dc.subjectFlutter Boundaryen_US
dc.subjectShock Dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectAeroelasticityen_US
dc.subjectEuler Flowen_US
dc.subjectTurbulenceen_US
dc.subjectTransonic Flowen_US
dc.subject.classificationAerospace Engineeringen_US
dc.titleShocks, Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction, And Transonic Flutteren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
dc.degree.disciplineFaculty of Engineeringen_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record